Categorized | Blog

The problem with quotas for women on boards and why they won’t work

Seems everyone is now weighing in on the quotas debate with our Governor General, Quentin Bryce becoming one of the latest champions for mandatory female representation on boards.  As I’ve said before, I’m a supporter of quotas largely because it’s time.  But even I don’t believe – in the short term – they will have a material impact on the number of women in leadership roles.

It’s time there were more women in decision making roles and driving the strategy of the companies that serve our communities. It’s time there was a better return on the investment we make in educating Australia’s women.  And it’s time to see a real shift in attitudes around what meritocracy really means – because I simply can’t believe only 3% of Australia’s vastly educated women are capable of being CEOs and only 4% are capable of holding line executive roles.

Norway is the poster child for gender quotas on boards, and much has been said about the success of its legislation in upping the number of female directors.  However so far even Norway hasn’t seen a flow on effect to other decision making roles: since Norway introduced quotas in 2004, there has been almost no increasein the number of women in senior line-management positions. So why so much focus on following their lead?

The advantage of focusing on boards first is that it’s easy to measure progress and it’s an easily definable group.  The number of board seats is easily calculated and percentages are easily tracked.  But the total number and reach is small: if the average board has ten directors, we’re talking about a total of 2000 board seats across all the ASX200.  Accounting for multiple directorships, the number comes down substantially – but even if every director held only one seat there would be only 800 board seats available to women at a 40% quota.


If the average board has ten directors, we’re talking about a total of 2000 board seats across all the ASX200… even if every director held only one seat there would be only 800 board seats available to women at a 40% quota.


Contrast this with the potential for promoting women into key executive and decision making roles inside our top organisations. Most of the big ASX listed companies will have leadership pools that encompass more individuals than the number of all the ASX200 directors combined – so surely that’s a better place to focus than boards if we’re serious about advancing women in business. Westpac alone – for example – where 3 of its 10 board directors are women – is focusing on it’s top 4,000 roles as it moves towards a target of 40% women across the Bank’s top 10% of leaders – that’s more than twice the number of board seats in the ASX200 combined, in just one company!

Of course one could argue that having women on boards is more likely to drive the gender agenda down through the executive ranks, particularly boards tie CEO remuneration to gender balance targets.  To again use the Westpac example it’s good to see this playing out: its CEO Gail Kelly has declared gender balance is now one of her strategic priorities and let’s hope it will drive some behaviour change given she had no women on her leadership team at St George, and currently has no women on her leadership team at Westpac.

To me, the important message from the Norway experience is that until quotas were mandated, gender targets on boards had been unattainable.  Companies decreed they had tried to find talented women for their boards, but there weren’t enough out there.  That is until it became a requirement for listing that at least 40% of board seats were held by women. Suddenly – at the risk of being delisted – the companies were motivated to try a little harder, and guess what?  

As if by magic, there were enough qualified, experienced and board ready women, after all.

I wonder if the same would be true if quotas now followed into its executive ranks?

What do you think? Will quotas work? Is it the right place to start? Does it really matter anyway? Should we start a petition for quotas across all key executive roles?  I’d love to hear your thoughts on this…


* indicates required

Join Me On Facebook

Let's just think about this for a minute and acknowledge what a brave and generous act this is by Wendy Bowman to protect our land and waterways... would you be prepared to do the same? ... See MoreSee Less

She's had her water supply contaminated by coalmining, her milk rendered undrinkable, and watched her property be coated in coal dust. Meet 83-year-ol...

View on Facebook

This is so up my alley. "In order to liberate women, we need to liberate men." (Anne Hathaway - UN Women Goodwill Ambassador). Because love is love, and parents are parents, and we need social policy and workplace cultures that encourages fathers to spend as much time with their children as mothers do. ... See MoreSee Less

"We need to liberate men in order to liberate women." Our Goodwill Ambassador Anne Hathaway speaking on paid parental leave on International #WomensDa...

View on Facebook

Check this out, I'm in awe. My friend Ronni Kahn is at it again, disrupting the food supply chain, offering food security to the vulnerable. I've shared before about OzHarvest. When I first met Ronni ten years ago I knew she was special, but what she has achieved and continues to achieve truly blows my mind. She cares so much about the people that OzHarvest serves, and every person in her life, and gives her everything to make sure that no person needs to go hungry. The international expansion of OzHarvest is awesome, and this "take what you need" supermarket in Sydney is just brilliance. Repurposing and rehoming surplus food, keeping it out of landfill so that we all benefit and business overheads are lowered. Win. Win. Win. Love it! ... See MoreSee Less

Opening Australia's first rescued food supermarket, OzHarvest Market at 147 Anzac Parade, Kensington in Sydney. Visit for mo...

View on Facebook